Venue: District Council Offices, Mill Lane, Wingerworth, Chesterfield, S42 6NG
Contact: Alan Maher
No. | Item | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Councillor J Birkin.
With the agreement of the Chair, Councillor K Rouse contributed to the meeting virtually through the electronic Conference Call system. She did not participate in the decisions taken by Cabinet at the meeting. |
||||
Declarations of Interest Members are requested to declare the existence and nature of any disclosable pecuniary interest and/or other interest, not already on their register of interests, in any item on the agenda and withdraw from the meeting at the appropriate time. Minutes: None. |
||||
Minutes of the Last Meeting PDF 216 KB To approve as a correct record and the Leader to sign the attached Minutes of the meeting of Cabinet held on Thursday 27 July 2023. Minutes: RESOLVED - That the Minutes of the meeting held on 27 July 2023 were approved. |
||||
Medium Term Financial Plan: Budget Monitoring Report April-June 2023 (Q1) PDF 669 KB Report of Councillor P Kerry, Deputy Leader of the Council and Portfolio Holder for Strategic Leadership and Finance. Decision: RESOLVED – That Cabinet noted the Quarter One budget monitoring position outlined in the report and detailed in Appendices 1-4 of the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – The report summarised the financial position of the Council following the first quarter’s budget monitoring exercise for the General Fund, the Housing Revenue Account and Capital Programme.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – None. The report set out information monitoring the position against the Council’s previously approved budget.
Please note that this was not a Key Decision so can be implemented by officers with immediate effect. Minutes: The report to Cabinet included an update on the financial position of the Council following the first quarter of the 2023-24 financial year budget monitoring exercise for the General Fund, the Housing Revenue Account and the Capital Programme. Members heard that the General Fund was projected to be underspent during the quarter. The reasons for this were set out in the report. Cabinet was also informed of variations between Directorates and the impact which the probable nationally determined pay settlement would have on the Council. This impact would need to be provided for in the revised budget.
Members heard that the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) had been stable during the quarter. They also noted the position on HRA Capital Programme, following the start of work on the North Wingfield New Build Scheme.
RESOLVED – That Cabinet noted the Quarter One budget monitoring position outlined in the report and detailed in Appendices 1-4 of the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – The report summarised the financial position of the Council following the first quarter’s budget monitoring exercise for the General Fund, the Housing Revenue Account and Capital Programme.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – None. The report set out information monitoring the position against the Council’s previously approved budget. |
||||
Establishment of Local Plan Review Working Group PDF 185 KB Report of Councillor S Pickering, Portfolio Holder for Environment and Place Additional documents: Decision: RESOLVED – That Cabinet recommend to Council atits meeting on 25 September 2023, the establishment of a Local Plan Review Working Group, in accordance with the structure in Option 4 of the report, and the terms of reference detailed in Appendix 1 of the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – To establish a Local Plan Review Working Group in order to undertake the review of the Local Plan. Based on the benefits and risks assessment of the 4 options, officers were of the view that Option 4 was the most appropriate course of action and struck the best balance. The Member Working Group would provide regular feedback to officers during the Local Plan review process.
Minutes: Cabinet considered proposals to establish a Local Plan Review Working Group. The report set out the purpose of the Group and gave options on its possible Membership.
Cabinet discussed the report. Members felt it important that the Review Group be established and begin its work as soon as possible. They concluded that Option 4 for the composition of the Group offered the best approach, by allowing for the Chairs and Vice Chairs of the Scrutiny Committees and of the Planning Committee, along with representatives of the different political groups, to be represented on it. They also felt it appropriate that the Portfolio Holder for Environment and Place Chair the Group. Cabinet agreed that this Option should now be recommended to Council for approval.
RESOLVED – That Cabinet recommend to Council atits meeting on 25 September 2023, the establishment of a Local Plan Review Working Group, in accordance with the structure in Option 4 of the report, and the terms of reference detailed in Appendix 1 of the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – To establish a Local Plan Review Working Group in order to undertake the review of the Local Plan. Based on the benefits and risks assessment of the 4 options, officers were of the view that Option 4 was the most appropriate course of action and struck the best balance. The Member Working Group would provide regular feedback to officers during the Local Plan review process.
|
||||
Decision on the Brampton Parish Neighbourhood Plan PDF 279 KB Report of Councillor S Pickering, Portfolio Holder for Environment and Place. Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes:
|
||||
North East Derbyshire UK Shared Prosperity Fund Update PDF 423 KB Report of Councillor J Barry, Portfolio Holder for Growth and Assets. Decision:
Minutes:
|
||||
Exclusion of Public The Leader to move:-
That the public be excluded from the meeting during the discussion of the following item of business to avoid the disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, (as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006). [The category of exempt information is stated after each item].
Minutes: RESOLVED – That the public be excluded from the meeting during the discussion of the following items of business to avoid the disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, (as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006). |
||||
Report of Councillor J Barry, Portfolio Holder for Growth and Assets
Cabinet will be asked to agree that the public be excluded from the meeting during the discussion of this item of business to avoid the disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 1, Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, (as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006).
Decision: RESOLVED – That Cabinet noted the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – To ensure that the Council maximises efficiencies and outcomes through commissioning voluntary sector organisations to help achieve the Council’s Priorities.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – No alternative options were considered appropriate, as the aim of the review was to increase transparency and accountability of commissioned services.
Please note that this was not a Key Decision so can be implemented by officers with immediate effect. Minutes: Cabinet received a report on Funding to Voluntary and Community Sector Infrastructure Organisations. As part of this, Cabinet received presentations on the work and outcomes achieved by two voluntary and community sector infrastructure support organisations which had been funded by the Council.
RESOLVED – That Cabinet noted the report.
REASONS FOR DECISION – To ensure that the Council maximises efficiencies and outcomes through commissioning voluntary sector organisations to help achieve the Council’s Priorities.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – No alternative options were considered appropriate, as the aim of the review was to increase transparency and accountability of commissioned services. |
||||
Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme Report of Councillor J Barry, Portfolio Holder for Growth and Assets
(Paragraph 3) Decision: RESOLVED
(1) That the Council retains legal ownership of the new commercial units and public realm areas that will be developed as part of the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme.
(2) That the Council adopts the ongoing management responsibilities of the new commercial business units and the public realm area within the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme.
(3) That the Council secures a Planning Approval and then seek further assurance from Derbyshire County Council in relation to their participation in the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme, and if necessary to report this response to Cabinet for further consideration.
REASONS FOR DECISION – The proposals allowed the Council to retain ownership and management control of the asset to ensure the long-term success of the regeneration project.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – As specified in the report.
Please note that this was not a Key Decision so can be implemented by officers with immediate effect. Minutes: The report to Cabinet highlighted a range of specific issues related to the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme and suggested actions that it would now be prudent for the Council to take.
RESOLVED
(1) That the Council retains legal ownership of the new commercial units and public realm areas that will be developed as part of the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme.
(2) That the Council adopts the ongoing management responsibilities of the new commercial business units and the public realm area within the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme.
(3) That the Council secures a Planning Approval and then seek further assurance from Derbyshire County Council in relation to their participation in the Clay Cross Town Centre Regeneration Scheme, and if necessary to report this response to Cabinet for further consideration.
REASONS FOR DECISION – The proposals allowed the Council to retain ownership and management control of the asset to ensure the long-term success of the regeneration project.
OTHER OPTIONS CONSIDERED AND REJECTED – As specified in the report. |
||||
Urgent Items To consider any other matter which the Leader is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency, in accordance with the provisions of Statutory Instrument 2012 No 2089, Regulation 11. Minutes: None. |