Agenda item

(a) Report No LTL/7/19-20/KR – Mr M, Sheffield – 12.35 pm

(b) Report No LTL/8/19-20/KR – Mr H, Sheffield – 13.05 pm

(a)            Mr M - Sheffield

The Sub-Committee considered Report No LTL/7/19-20/KR of the Licensing Team Leader in respect of Mr M – Sheffield.  The purpose of the report was to enable Members to decide whether or not Mr M was a fit and proper person to continue to hold a Private Hire Vehicle Driver’s Licence.

Mr M was present at the meeting, alongside his Union representative, Mr H.  He confirmed that he had received a copy of the report, and the procedure to be followed at the meeting.

The Licensing Team Leader explained that Mr M had applied to renew a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Driver License. Mr M had satisfactorily completed his DVLA check, his right to work in the UK, NAFN register check, medical and safeguarding course.

It was stated that at the time of his renewal application, Mr M had completed a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check. The DBS certificate included a number of convictions that included serious offences against the person and dishonesty. The Sub Committee heard that Mr M had been licensed with the Council since 2004 with the historical offences, however, in September 2018 the Council adopted a new Taxi Licensing Policy. Members were reminded that the recent policy change now placed the applicant outside of the revised policy, and was therefore brought before Members for consideration.

Mr M’s Union representative, Mr H, explained that there had been a significant length of time since his client’s initial convictions, and that a previous Licensing Sub-Committee had declared him ‘fit and proper’ and granted him a License. Mr M stated that there was no complaints on his record, and presented a letter of support from his current employer. Mr M reiterated that he had no complaints, and was a young man at the time of his early convictions. Mr M believed that he had mitigating circumstances to his most recent conviction.

The Licensing Team Leader asked Mr M to explain why he had failed to declare a driving prosecution from another Authority on his application form. The applicant claimed that he did not fully understand the question, and that a member of staff had helped him complete the form. The Sub-Committee also asked about the circumstances of his most recent conviction, and why he believed he had mitigating circumstances.

The Sub-Committee discussed the application. 

Members were reminded that they must have regard to the policy document and the objectives set out within it.  Notwithstanding the existence of the policy and any other relevant Council policy, each application or enforcement measure will be considered on its own merits.  Where it is necessary for the Council to depart from its policy, reasons will be given for so doing.  

Mr M, Mr H and the Licensing Team Leader was requested to leave the meeting while the Sub-Committee considered its decision.

The Sub-Committee having considered carefully all the written and oral evidence submitted to it:-

RESOLVED (unanimously) –

That Mr M be granted a Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicle Driver’s Licence.

The reasons for the Sub-Committees’ decision were as follows:-

The offences on Mr M’s record were mostly historic, and since then he had demonstrated a reasonable record of conduct.  The circumstances that had surrounded an assault of an authorised officer in 2012 did not justify Mr M being  considered to be unfit to hold a licence.

Mr M, Mr H and the Licensing Team Leader were re-admitted to the meeting and advised of the above decision and their right to appeal against it to the Magistrates’ Court within 21 days of the receipt of the decision notice.

(Licensing Team Leader)

(Paragraph 1)